As the 2020 election investigation is ongoing, the Secretary of State of Pennsylvania together with the Dominion Voting Machines is now preventing the cyber and IT experts to make an investigation with the machines used in the last election. They also threatened to decertify the machines if the investigation will take further, though even before the investigation process they already made a decertification of these machines.

The Gateway Pundit has previously reported how the proposed investigation into Fulton County, Pennsylvania’s voting machines that have been halted by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court due to a request from the Pennsylvania Secretary of State and Dominion Voting Machines. 700 pages document was then provided by the two entities that stated their reasons as to why the Fulton County investigation should be stopped.

Previous reports also stated how both Pennsylvania Senate President Pro Tempore Jacob Corman, III, and Senator Cris Dush made a request to stop the corrupt PA Secretary of State’s (SoS’s) emergency application to stay. The said request was made to Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

The second argument from the Senators (p. 5) is that the SoS believes that she can decertify machines if the voting machines are inspected but these machines have already been decertified by the SoS:

Second, the Secretary makes much of Directive 1 of 2021, whereby the Department of State arrogated to itself the power to control what counties can do with electronic voting machines. But Directive 1, and the supposed problem it is designed to solve, isn’t applicable to Senator Dush’s request.  Directive 1 prohibits counties from making their voting machines accessible to third parties for inspection, and provides that violation of a county’s nondisclosure obligation will result in the machine’s decertification – and the Department is absolved of any obligation to reimburse the county for the cost of new machines to replace those that were decertified. That concern is inapplicable to this situation, however. Here, Senator Dush has asked to image the hard drives of already decertified voting machines that will not be used in future elections. Thus, the Secretary’s assertion that Directive 1 justifies overriding Senator Dush’s request for the hard drive images of already inspected and decertified voting machines is of no note

This made us question how can the PA Supreme Court not agree?  How are decertified machines included in the scope of the SoS’s arguments?

Source: The Gateway Pundit