More than two years ago it became public knowledge that former FBI Director James Comey most likely manipulated, ignored and destroyed evidence before rendering his decision to exonerate Hillary Clinton.
The question has always remained as to how Comey orchestrated the destruction of evidence and escaped reprisal from then Attorney General Loretta Lynch for so grossly allowing the mismanagement of a slam dunk prosecution.
Thanks to the American Center for Law and Justice we have the answer. Comey’s actions were sanctioned by Obama’s Attorney General Loretta Lynch:
The ACLJ has just obtained previously unreleased documents related to the Clinton investigation and immunity agreements given to top Clinton aides. These agreements reveal that James Comey’s Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Loretta Lynch’s Department of Justice (DOJ) granted immunity to Hillary Clinton’s aides and lawyers, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, from prosecution for anything found on their laptops violating multiple felony criminal statutes governing the mishandling of classified information and/or the removal or destruction of records, including Espionage Act provisions. Further, the DOJ and FBI also agreed to evade the statutory requirements of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by purporting to deem the contents of the laptops as not under DOJ or FBI “custody or control.”
The ACLJ has obtained the DOJ’s infamous immunity agreements with Hillary Clinton’s top aides Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson – documents previously unreleased to the public and which include the DOJ attempting to enter an agreement not to comply with the requirements of FOIA, and which confirm it agreed to “dispose” of evidence, including Mills’ and Samuelson’s “culling laptops” which contained all of the missing emails from Hilary Clinton’s private homebrew server.
According to the DOJ Inspector General, who identified these as the “culling laptops,” “[a]ll 62,320 emails pulled from the Clinton servers were stored at one time on these laptops.” Having taken control of these laptops, agreeing to severely limit its searches, agreeing to unlawfully shield the laptops from FOIA, then agreeing to dispose of the laptops, it appears the Comey FBI and Lynch DOJ did everything in their power to protect Clinton’s senior aides and lawyers from both criminal liability and public scrutiny.
While these new documents seem to reveal, in my opinion that, Lynch’s DOJ colluding with Comey’s FBI they do not provide definitive evidence of the attorney general Lynch’s direct involvement.
However, Bill Clinton’s “unplanned” meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the tarmac at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport just days before Comey exonerated Hillary Clinton is about as incriminating as it gets.
Further, following the tarmac meeting the Washington Times wrote Lynch “plunged her department and the White House into a panic when a local reporter got wind of the meeting.
Why the panic if there’s a simple explanation or if there were no direct connections to the Obama White House?
Is Obama’s Attorney General Loretta Lynch on U.S. Attorney John Durham’s long list of witnesses he’s spoken to. Or, is planning to speak to? ]
The walls protecting the Obama-Clinton Deep State are slowly coming down.