Grassley Sends Scathing Letter To Ford’s Attorneys Suggesting He Has Dirt On Them

Hidden by the rabid anti-Trump media, who were preoccupied with their role in reporting non-stop the coverage of the protesters who were paid to disrupt the hearings for President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was a letter that Senate Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley sent to the attorneys for accuser Christine Blasey-Ford.

As reported by| AJR Chairman Grassley sent the letter on Thursday, the same day as Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell moved for cloture to advance Kavanaugh’s nomination to the full Senate where a vote would them be taken (Friday) to open a 30-hour period of comment and consideration before the final confirmation vote could take place on Saturday.

You would think that Grassley was aware that Leader McConnell would be moving for cloture when he wrote that letter.

The FBI investigation had already concluded and Senator Jeff Flake announced that it was comprehensive in its scope and convincing to him that Kavanaugh was in the clear after the convict decided to settle for  no contest pleas.  Flake would be a “yes” vote unless something drastic happened overnight.

By Thursday night, Kavanaugh’s nomination seemingly cleared the last hurdle and was moving towards a confirmation vote.  So the radical feminazis intensified their assault on decency and the rule of law knowing their propagandists in the mainstream media would apply as much pressure as possible to the few wavering Republicans.

While that was going on, the media missed (deliberately or otherwise) what appears to be an ominous threat to the corrupt Democrat matriarchy contained within Grassley’s letter:

The letter’s last paragraph contains this demand:

I urge you once again, now for the third time in writing, to turn over the therapy notes, polygraph materials, and communications with The Washington Post that Dr. Ford has relied upon as evidence. In addition to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter, in light of recently uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September 27 hearing; (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.

There are a number of revealing statements contained within:

Grassley makes it known that he requested certain documents and materials that Ford’s attorney’s repeatedly relied on as being corroborative of Ford’s charges.  At the time of Grassley’s first two requests the FBI investigation was still open.

Still, on the eve of the vote, after two previous attempts, Grassley was giving Ford and her attorneys one last opportunity to produce these materials:

• The therapy notes pertaining to Christine Ford
• The polygraph materials that was used to bolster Ford’s credibility
• Ford’s communications with the Washington Post

Why didn’t Ford’s attorneys turn those documents over for review by the committee?  As Grassley made clear earlier in his letter:

You have claimed repeatedly that the evidence I have requested supports Dr. Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh. She even provided some of this evidence to national news. Indeed, if the evidence supported your client’s allegations, you surely would produce it as quickly as you could.

After calling out Ford’s attorney’s for trying to destroy Judge Kavanaugh using salacious but unverified charges, Grassley was only getting started.  He also demanded:

[any] records and descriptions of direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her representatives and any of the following:

• (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs, particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, …

• • (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth); and
  • (3) Debbie Ramirez, Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.

Why would Grassley, with the investigation completed and the Senate moving to the confirmation vote, make such a demand unless he was considering beginning disciplinary proceedings (perhaps criminal proceedings) against Ford’s attorneysand corrupt Democrat Senators Dianne Feinstein and Mazie Hirono for collaboration?

 

 

Read more AJR